Electric Power Board of Chattanooga as a Model for Municipal Broadband Communication, Public Trust, and Digital Inclusion

When Electric Power Board of Chattanooga announced in 2010 that it was making gigabit internet service available to every home and business within its 600-square-mile service territory, it was doing something no community had done before. America’s first gigabit city did not emerge from a single dramatic policy decision but from more than a decade of deliberate infrastructure investment, sustained public communication, and a utility organization that understood how to translate technically complex capital decisions into community outcomes residents could understand and support. Fifteen years later, a peer-reviewed economic impact study conducted by the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga documented $5.3 billion in community benefit generated by EPB’s fiber optic network and automated electric grid since 2010, with projections that the combined systems’ impact will grow to as much as $10 billion by 2035.

EPB, established in 1935 as an independent board of the City of Chattanooga, has operated as a publicly owned electric utility serving Chattanooga, Hamilton County, and surrounding communities in southeastern Tennessee for more than eight decades. Its 600-square-mile service territory encompasses urban neighborhoods in downtown Chattanooga, suburban communities across Hamilton County, and lower-density rural areas at the edges of the service area. EPB had served more than 170,000 electric customers when it launched EPB Fiber Optics in 2009 and began the infrastructure rollout that would make the utility the most consequential case study in municipal broadband communication in the United States.

The story of EPB’s broadband program is, at its core, a communication story. The infrastructure investment itself, funded through a combination of an $111 million federal stimulus grant from the Department of Energy and an $169 million bond, required public and political support that had to be built and sustained before a mile of fiber was deployed. The program faced organized opposition from incumbent telecommunications providers who funded campaigns designed to discredit municipal broadband as an appropriate use of public utility resources. And the equity programs that EPB built on top of its network infrastructure, most notably HCS EdConnect, required communication investment of a fundamentally different kind: reaching the households most in need of connectivity at exactly the moment when connectivity had become essential for learning and work. Understanding how EPB communicated through each of these phases, and what its experience reveals about how municipal broadband authorities can build and sustain public trust, offers important guidance for utilities across the country navigating their own broadband investment decisions.

Building the Foundation: Communicating Infrastructure Investment Before the First Fiber Was Deployed

Why Public Trust Had to Precede Public Investment

EPB’s path to becoming America’s first gigabit city began not with the fiber optic network but with the automated electric grid that the fiber would enable. In 2008, EPB secured a bond to begin construction of what would become the most advanced automated grid system in the United States, a next-generation electric distribution system that embedded fiber optic communication capability throughout EPB’s service territory to reduce outages, improve response time, and enable customers to manage their energy usage in real time. The fiber optic infrastructure was originally designed to support the smart grid’s communication requirements. Its transformation into a community-wide broadband network followed from the recognition that the same infrastructure could deliver internet, television, and voice services to every home and business in EPB’s territory.

This sequencing matters for understanding how EPB built public support for its broadband investment. The fiber optic network was not introduced to EPB’s ratepayers as a speculative venture into telecommunications. It was introduced as a natural extension of infrastructure they had already supported for its electric grid benefits, infrastructure that was already making tangible improvements to outage response and service reliability. When EPB announced that the same fiber network would also make Chattanooga the first gigabit city in the nation, the community was evaluating that announcement against the backdrop of a smart grid investment that was already delivering demonstrable results.

The 2014 snowfall that tested the automated grid made this concrete. A heavy, wet snow affecting about 76,000 EPB customers could have required eight days to restore, as a comparable storm in 1993 had. The automated grid automatically restored or prevented about 40,000 outages. The remaining 36,000 customers were restored within three days with the help of mutual aid crews. A storm that would have taken more than a week became a three-day restoration. That kind of documented, verifiable outcome gave EPB a communication foundation for its broader infrastructure investment that most municipal broadband authorities do not have: ratepayers who had personally experienced the reliability benefits of the underlying infrastructure and had factual basis for trusting that EPB’s investment decisions delivered what the utility said they would.

For municipal broadband authorities beginning the public communication process from scratch, the EPB experience suggests that infrastructure investment communication is most effective when it is grounded in outcomes ratepayers can verify rather than projections they must accept on faith. EPB did not ask Chattanooga to trust that fiber optic infrastructure would deliver community benefits. It demonstrated those benefits through the automated grid before extending the same infrastructure into broadband service, and then quantified those benefits through independent economic analysis that gave ratepayers and elected officials a documented basis for evaluating the investment.

Overcoming Incumbent Opposition: Communication Across a Contested Political Environment

Maintaining Public Confidence When Opponents Are Actively Working to Erode It

EPB’s broadband launch occurred in a political environment shaped in significant part by the organized opposition of incumbent telecommunications providers who viewed municipal broadband as a competitive threat. That opposition manifested in public relations campaigns, legal challenges, and lobbying efforts at the state legislative level designed to limit or prevent municipal broadband expansion. EPB faced four lawsuits before its fiber optic network was fully deployed. Incumbent providers funded public messaging campaigns intended to raise doubts about the viability, cost, and appropriateness of a public utility operating in the telecommunications market.

The communication challenge this created for EPB was not simply a matter of explaining the broadband program’s technical merits. It was a matter of sustaining ratepayer and community confidence in the program through an extended period of organized opposition, legal uncertainty, and public messaging designed specifically to undermine that confidence. Many public utilities in similar positions have found that incumbent opposition, if left unanswered in the public communication environment, can erode the community support that elected officials and utility boards need to sustain a capital program through the years required to complete it.

EPB’s response to this environment reflected a communication approach grounded in transparency and measurable outcomes rather than advocacy. Rather than positioning itself primarily as a competitor to incumbent providers, EPB communicated consistently about what its network was delivering to the community: faster speeds, lower prices, and service quality that earned recognition from independent consumer organizations. In 2016, EPB Fiber Optics was named America’s best provider of internet and television services by Consumer Reports, based on a reader survey of 172,000 subscribers that gave EPB top rankings for reliability, product quality, and customer service. That kind of third-party, consumer-based validation carried credibility that utility-issued communications could not produce on their own.

EPB also built a record of customer satisfaction that provided a sustained, documented answer to incumbent claims that municipal broadband was not a viable or high-quality service. For a ninth consecutive year through 2024, EPB earned J.D. Power’s top customer satisfaction ranking for residential electric service in the South among midsize utilities. Consumer Reports ranked EPB the number two home internet provider nationwide in both 2024 and 2025, with five out of five ratings in every category including value, reliability, speed, technical support, and customer service. By 2018, just nine years after launching, EPB Fiber Optics had reached more than 100,000 customers, representing approximately 60 percent of the available market in its service territory. Each of these outcomes provided EPB with communication material grounded in customer experience rather than utility self-promotion, a distinction that matters enormously in a contested public communication environment.

HCS EdConnect: Communication as Digital Inclusion Infrastructure

Reaching the Households That Standard Utility Outreach Cannot

The launch of HCS EdConnect in June 2020 represented a fundamentally different kind of communication challenge for EPB. The program, a partnership between EPB, Hamilton County Schools, and The Enterprise Center, was designed to provide free high-speed fiber internet service to all economically challenged K-12 students and their families in Hamilton County, at no charge to their families, for a minimum of ten years with the intention to continue indefinitely. The program launched as the COVID-19 pandemic had simultaneously closed school buildings and made home internet access essential for continuing education. EPB’s in-place fiber optic infrastructure made it possible to connect students who could not have been served through any other existing mechanism at the speed the moment required.

The communication challenge HCS EdConnect presented was distinct from EPB’s standard broadband marketing. The households the program was designed to serve were not, in general, EPB’s existing fiber customers. They were the families in Hamilton County who had not had home internet access, whose children were among the students furthest from digital connection. Reaching those households required communication through channels and partnerships that EPB’s standard customer communication infrastructure had not been built to reach. It required trusted intermediaries in the form of schools, community organizations, and social service agencies who could communicate the program’s availability to families who might not encounter or respond to utility-issued outreach on their own.

The program’s design reflected this understanding. Hamilton County Schools, as a partner in the program, brought direct relationships with every family in the district, including the families most in need of the connectivity HCS EdConnect provided. The Enterprise Center, a local nonprofit with deep roots in Chattanooga’s communities, brought community trust and organizational capacity that extended EPB’s reach into neighborhoods where the utility’s standard communication channels were less effective. The program committed to providing service not for a pilot period but for at least ten years, a commitment designed specifically to build trust with eligible families who had reason to be skeptical of programs that might prove temporary.

By the end of its first school year, HCS EdConnect had reached more than 25,000 people, with more than one-third of all Hamilton County students benefiting from the program. By November 2021, the program had delivered in-home internet connections to 15,368 students in 8,522 households at no cost. In its first full year of operation, HCS EdConnect was recognized by Bloomberg, U.S. News and World Report, and Vox as a model program for the nation. It received the American Public Power Association’s Sue Kelly Community Service Award for providing high-speed internet to 25,000 people in need at no charge to their families. It won a Smart 50 award at The Smart Cities Connect Conference in 2022 and was recognized as a Results for America case study for its demonstrated approach to connecting students without home internet access during a period when that connectivity was essential for continuing education.

The communication lessons from HCS EdConnect are applicable to any utility program designed to reach households that standard outreach channels do not effectively serve. Partnership with organizations that already have trusted relationships with the target population is not a supplemental outreach strategy. It is the core delivery mechanism for programs whose value depends on reaching the households most in need rather than the households most easily reached. And program design decisions, including the commitment to ten years of service rather than a time-limited pilot, are themselves communication decisions: they communicate to eligible households whether the program is a genuine long-term resource or an initiative that may not outlast the immediate crisis that prompted it.

The Economic Impact Study as a Long-Term Communication Investment

Independent Research as a Foundation for Sustained Public Trust

One of the most consequential communication decisions EPB made across its broadband program was the investment in independent economic impact research to document the community benefits generated by its fiber optic network and automated electric grid. The first major study, published in January 2021, documented $2.69 billion in community benefit during the first ten years since EPB completed its community-wide fiber network. The study was conducted by Bento Lobo, Ph.D., who serves as head of the Department of Finance and Economics at the Rollins College of Business at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, an independent academic institution with no financial relationship to EPB. The research was subsequently peer-reviewed and published, giving it the methodological credibility that distinguishes independent academic research from utility-commissioned marketing materials.

The 2025 follow-up study expanded the analysis and found that the combined systems had generated $5.3 billion in net community benefit since 2010, with projections extending through 2035. Key findings from the most recent study include the creation of 10,420 jobs from 2011 through 2024, representing 31 percent of all jobs created in the area during that period; $84.06 million paid to local schools and public services through payment-in-lieu-of-taxes contributions to Hamilton County, the City of Chattanooga, and other local governments; prevention of more than 417.7 million minutes of power outages for customers, reflecting an annual average outage reduction of approximately 59 percent; and documentation that EPB’s fiber optic network and smart grid have returned more than six times the original cost of the investment since the project was fully completed in 2011.

The communication value of this independent research extends well beyond the specific figures it documents. A utility that can point to peer-reviewed, independently conducted economic analysis of its broadband program’s community benefits occupies a fundamentally different communication position than a utility making first-person claims about the value of its own investment. When EPB communicates that its network has generated $5.3 billion in community benefit, that statement is backed by a named researcher, a named institution, a peer-reviewed methodology, and a documented study that ratepayers, elected officials, journalists, and community organizations can read and evaluate independently. The communication investment was in the research itself. The return on that investment is the ongoing credibility it provides for every communication EPB makes about its broadband program.

For municipal broadband authorities at any stage of development, the EPB approach to economic impact documentation offers a model worth studying. The most effective long-term communication strategy for a community-owned infrastructure investment is not a sustained marketing campaign. It is the accumulation of independently verifiable, publicly documented evidence that the investment is delivering the outcomes it was designed to produce. That evidence, built over years rather than assembled for a single announcement, becomes the foundation of public trust that sustains political and community support through the rate decisions, expansion investments, and program developments that a long-term broadband utility requires.

Customer Satisfaction as Communication Currency

Third-Party Validation and the Sustained Record of Service Quality

Municipal broadband programs face a persistent communication challenge that investor-owned telecommunications providers do not: the assumption, sometimes reinforced by incumbent provider messaging, that municipal utilities are not capable of delivering telecommunications services at the quality level that commercially competitive providers can achieve. EPB’s response to this challenge was not primarily rhetorical. It was operational: building and maintaining a service quality record that independent consumer organizations documented consistently over time.

The J.D. Power customer satisfaction rankings that EPB has earned for ten consecutive years through 2025 are not marketing claims. They are consumer survey results collected and published by an independent research organization that surveys customers across utilities nationwide using consistent methodology. When EPB communicates that it has earned the J.D. Power top satisfaction ranking for residential electric service in the South among midsize utilities for a decade in a row, it is citing a finding that consumers can verify through J.D. Power’s published reports. The same is true of Consumer Reports’ rankings, which are based on subscriber surveys of 172,000 people and published as consumer guidance rather than industry marketing.

This third-party validation record serves several distinct communication functions simultaneously. It provides EPB with credible, verifiable responses to incumbent claims about municipal broadband service quality. It gives ratepayers and elected officials an independent basis for evaluating whether EPB is managing its broadband program effectively. It gives journalists covering EPB a documented factual foundation for coverage that goes beyond the utility’s own statements. And it gives community members who may be skeptical of utility communications generally a reason to trust that EPB’s claims about its service quality reflect what customers actually experience rather than what the utility wants them to believe.

The pattern of consumer recognition that EPB has built is also self-reinforcing over time. Each year that EPB maintains its J.D. Power ranking and Consumer Reports position adds another data point to a record that becomes more credible with each addition. A utility that has earned top satisfaction rankings for one year might be having a good year. A utility that has earned those rankings for ten consecutive years is demonstrating something more durable: a service quality commitment that is embedded in how the organization operates rather than a result of any single year’s performance.

Lessons for Municipal Broadband Authorities and Public Utilities

EPB’s experience with municipal broadband communication, from the smart grid investment that preceded it to the HCS EdConnect program built on top of it, offers several transferable lessons for public utilities navigating broadband investment and digital inclusion programs.

First, infrastructure investment communication is most effective when it is grounded in verifiable outcomes rather than projections. EPB did not ask Chattanooga to trust that its smart grid investment would deliver reliability benefits. It demonstrated those benefits in documented storm events before extending the same infrastructure into broadband service. Ratepayers who had personally experienced the grid’s performance had factual basis for trusting EPB’s subsequent investment decisions in a way that ratepayers evaluating only forward-looking claims do not.

Second, organized incumbent opposition requires sustained, evidence-based communication rather than defensive response. EPB’s answer to incumbent campaigns was not a counter-campaign. It was a sustained accumulation of independent consumer satisfaction data, third-party recognition, and economic impact research that gave community members verifiable reasons to trust the program’s value regardless of what competitors claimed. That record, built over years, was more durable than any single communication response to any specific opponent claim.

Third, digital inclusion programs require communication infrastructure that reaches households standard utility outreach does not. HCS EdConnect’s success depended on partnership with Hamilton County Schools and The Enterprise Center, organizations with existing trusted relationships in the communities the program was designed to serve. The program’s long-term service commitment was itself a communication decision, building trust with eligible families by demonstrating that the program was a genuine long-term resource rather than a temporary initiative.

Fourth, independent economic impact research is a long-term communication investment with compounding returns. The peer-reviewed UTC studies that documented $2.69 billion and then $5.3 billion in community benefit gave EPB communication material grounded in independent academic research rather than utility self-promotion. Each study extended and reinforced the credibility of EPB’s public communication about its broadband program in ways that no amount of internally produced communication could replicate.

Fifth, third-party customer satisfaction data is more persuasive than utility-issued quality claims. EPB’s ten consecutive J.D. Power top rankings and its Consumer Reports national standing provide independent, consumer-survey-based evidence of service quality that ratepayers, elected officials, and journalists can verify through published reports. Building that record requires sustained operational commitment to service quality, not communication investment alone, but the communication return on that operational investment is substantial and durable.

Conclusion: EPB as a Model for Long-Term Municipal Broadband Communication

EPB of Chattanooga’s broadband communication program demonstrates what is possible when a public utility treats long-term community trust as the organizing principle of its communication strategy rather than as a byproduct of good operational performance. The $5.3 billion in documented community benefit that independent research attributes to EPB’s fiber optic network and automated electric grid did not communicate itself. It was built through fifteen years of deliberate communication decisions: grounding infrastructure investment in verifiable outcomes, sustaining public confidence through organized opposition, reaching beyond standard utility communication channels to connect the households most in need of connectivity, investing in independent economic research that gave ratepayers and elected officials documented evidence of the program’s value, and maintaining the service quality record that third-party consumer organizations converted into credible public documentation.

No element of that communication record was assembled quickly, and none of it was the product of a single campaign or announcement. The credibility EPB has built as a municipal broadband authority is the accumulation of outcomes documented over time, partnerships deepened over years, and research conducted at intervals that captured how the investment’s value grew as the network matured. For municipal broadband authorities at earlier stages of that journey, the EPB experience offers both a model for what sustained communication investment can produce and a realistic picture of the timeline over which that investment accumulates into durable public trust.

The most important lesson from EPB is also the most straightforward: in the contested political environment that municipal broadband investment inevitably occupies, the most effective long-term communication strategy is delivering service that independent observers document, measuring community benefit that independent researchers quantify, and building partnerships that extend the utility’s reach and credibility beyond what its own communication channels can achieve alone.

SCG’s Strategic Approach to Public Utility Communication

Align your agency’s messaging, outreach programs, and ratepayer engagement strategies

SCG helps municipal broadband authorities, energy providers, solid waste departments, wastewater agencies, stormwater utilities, and public works departments build communication systems that make complex infrastructure investments, service programs, and equity initiatives easier for ratepayers, elected officials, and community partners to understand, evaluate, and support. By aligning long-term infrastructure communication, digital inclusion outreach, independent impact documentation, and third-party partnership strategies, agencies can build the sustained public trust that community-owned broadband and infrastructure programs require.

Whether your agency is launching a new municipal broadband program and building public support before infrastructure deployment begins, communicating against organized incumbent opposition through documented service quality and independent consumer validation, designing digital inclusion outreach that reaches households standard utility communication does not serve, commissioning independent economic impact research that gives ratepayers and elected officials a verifiable basis for evaluating your program, or developing community partnerships that extend your communication reach into neighborhoods where utility outreach has historically been less effective, a strategic communication framework can help your agency build the credibility and community trust that long-term broadband investment requires.

Use the form below to connect with our team and explore how a strategic communication framework can strengthen your agency’s broadband communication and community trust outcomes.